I probably give this answer about once per week on TSF alone.įrom your photos, I don't see anything wrong with your "S" coin, but better photos would help. Measuring the diameter is easy, but attempting to measure the depth or thickness is almost meaningless, because there are at least 3 different thicknesses you could measure. You need better scales, at least graduated to 0.1 grams rather than 1 gram, but preferably 0.01 grams. Also if there is any difference in the silver content, the "S" is more likely to have the slightly higher content. It will make it easier to sppecify which you are referring to. You omitted to mention that one is London Mint, and the other Sydney Mint. So is it a fake or am I putting too much faith in my sovereign balance? In the face of my not so thorough testing methods, my question to the forum is that is there anything about my suspect Sov that jumps out to identify it as a fraud? Both coins read exactly 8g on my not so expensive or accurate scales. It will not fit in the balance which ever way i try to fit it in there. On the left is an 1896 that I know to be genuine. Mine is an not overly fake looking (to me) 1896 Sov. While Luckbox Magazine and tastylive believe that the information contained in Luckbox Magazine is reliable and make efforts to assure its accuracy, the publisher disclaims responsibility for opinions and representation of facts contained therein.Today I had the pleasure of that dreaded moment where you discover you’ve been potentially harbouring a stow away in your stack. When you start comparing the two coins closely, you will notice a lot of things do not match up on your coin. Below that is the photo of your coin for comparison. Nothing contained in this magazine constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, promotion or offer by Luckbox Magazine or tastylive, Inc., or any of its subsidiaries, affiliates or assigns. Here is a photo of a real 1795 Draped Bust Dollar that has been graded and authenticated by a professional grading service (PCGS). For simplicity, the examples and illustrations in these articles may not include transaction costs. Transaction costs (commissions and other fees) are important factors and should be considered when evaluating any securities, futures, or digital asset transaction or trade. The information provided in Luckbox Magazine may not be appropriate for all individuals, and is provided without respect to any individual’s financial sophistication, financial situation, investing time horizon or risk tolerance. Trading securities, futures products, and digital assets involves risk and may result in a loss greater than the original amount invested. It is not, nor is it intended to be, trading or investment advice or a recommendation that any security, futures contract, digital asset, other product, transaction, or investment strategy is suitable for any person. Luckbox Magazine content is for informational and educational purposes only. Magazine is a product and service offered by tastylive, Inc. Teodora Dobrilova is a tech enthusiast, author at Review42, and the editor-in-chief at TechJury. If the reviewer has written several similar reviews or has submitted a lot of reviews in a short period of time, the answer seems obvious. If a particular review seems suspicious, check the poster’s account. Repetitive comments raise red flags with reviews. Use free tools that analyze Amazon reviews, such as ReviewMeta or Fakespot. But besides the arguably off-topic and hard-to-read ones, what percentage of Amazon reviews might be downright fake? Nearly 95% of shoppers read them before making a purchase, according to PowerReviews data. What’s not to love?Īs it turns out, there may be one thing: customer reviews. No annoying queues, no talking to humans and, perhaps best of all, shoppers can scroll through Amazon in pajamas while drinking raspberry wine. It’s faster than traditional shopping, and things get delivered to the front door.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |